Skip to main content

Introducing the TechEthos technology families

Introducing the TechEthos Technology families
21 December 2021

Authored by: Andrea Porcari, Gustavo Gonzalez, Daniela Pimponi
Reviewed by: Andrew Whittington-Davis and Nuala Polo

News | 21 December 2021

Based on a wide-ranging horizon scanning of new and emerging technologies, TechEthos selected three families of technologies that are expected to have disruptive socio-economic and ethical implications: Climate Engineering, Extended Digital Reality, and Neurotechnologies. TechEthos will use them as models to explore the interaction of technologies with the planet, the digital world, and the human body to develop operative ethics-by-design guidelines for researchers and innovators. 

New and emerging technologies are changing all aspects of our lives, from our habits, to how we live, take care and cure ourselves, how we interact and communicate with others, and how society is organised and developed. These revolutionary technologies can bring benefits, but at the same time, raise new risks and concerns. How can we guarantee that these technologies will not adversely surprise us in a few years? What regulates the development of new and emerging technologies and their applications? At TechEthos, our focus is to address such questions by developing ethics-by-design guidelines that will ensure that ethical principles and values are embedded during the design and development of new and emerging technologies because, after all, anticipating such risks and concerns can help avoid or mitigate future undesirable outcomes. 

Our selection process

The selection of these three technology families is based on a horizon scanning process carried out during the first phase of the TechEthos project. We systematically analysed and compared the findings of authoritative and up-to-date studies that address similar technological interests, allowing us to identify a set of new and emerging technologies with high socio-economic impact and significant ethical dimensions. This analysis also provided valuable insights that helped us identify criteria for defining and assessing the potential socio-economic impacts of these technologies, supported by expert consultations, online surveys, interviews, and workshops. From here, we were able to cluster technologies into a set of technology families, according to their shared functions, applications, time-to-market, economic, ethic, public, policy and legal impacts 

Our choice

The selected three technology families all have a high potential to cause disruption socio-economically and ethically and focus on overcoming existing social concerns. These points of contact were widely addressed and debated during the different steps of the TechEthos horizon scanning process. Such matters were mainly based on how new and emerging technologies can affect the use and access to natural resources, how they can be used to modify our atmosphere, how individuals might interact with and use cutting-edge digital technologies to alter their real-world environments, or how people can understand and modify brain functions through novel technological strategies. These and other considerations were the foundations on which TechEthos made its selection:  

    • Climate Engineering (also known as geoengineering) technologies can help mitigate anthropogenic climate change on a local and worldwide scale and detect and respond to global threats due to the climate crisis. They represent a group of technologies that can act on the Earth’s climate system by reducing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and other anthropic emissions or directly change physical or chemical processes in the biosphere to achieve direct climate control. This technology family includes, for example, carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) technologies can help reduce cumulative anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which poses significant consequences to the planet’s temperature regulation. Solar geoengineering technologies are another example, raising the possibility of modifying the biosphere’s interaction with solar radiation by creating a dense cloud of particles in the stratosphere to reflect part of the solar radiation. Despite their high research and industrial relevance, key ethical concerns arise around these technologies: who can access these technologies? Will they have local or global effects, who will decide about their implementation, and what could be the environmental consequences of their applications?  
    • Digital Extended Reality technologies combine advanced computing systems (hardware and software) that can change how people connect with their surroundings through virtual (VR) and augmented (AR) and mixed (MR) realities. Through these immersive technologies, people can access virtual worlds remotely from any place and interact through digital avatars. Connecting people worldwide can be beneficial; for example, to train employees and provide new services to customers, or universities and schools can use this technology for educational purposes. However, many questions circle around this technology family: will they monitor our behaviour in such virtual environments? Will they be safe? Who will have access to it? Digital Extended Reality also includes AI-based technologies focused on recognising, processing and emulating human cognitive functions (e.g., voice, gesture, movement, emotions, psychological dispositions) and how these can be used to replace, nudge and influence human actions. For example, Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm is used to process and analyse vast quantities of human language information (e.g., voice, text, emotional data) to profile people and create targeted online advertising. This algorithm profiling could use personal and non-explicitly authorised data from users (e.g., from social networks), and people might be persuaded to avoid acting freely on the internet not to be negatively categorised, a phenomenon known as the “chilling” effect. NLP can be used to imitate human interaction, and for example, could even imitate deceased people virtually. Other examples of ethical repercussions of digital extended reality technologies include monitoring and surveillance, privacy, security, and sensible data management. 


    • Neurotechnologies represent a group of technologies used for directly monitoring, assessing, mediating, manipulating, and emulating the human brain’s structure, functions, and capabilities. These technologies offer possibilities to improve health and well-being. They are expected to change existing medical practices and redefine clinical and non-clinical monitoring and interventions. For example, patients with degenerative motor conditions can be treated efficiently using neuro-devices, enabling neuron regeneration by stimulating certain brain zones and helping them overcome such critical situations. Such neuro-devices are still an object of research for treating Parkinson’s, patients who have suffered a stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, severe trauma, and other ailments. Nevertheless, neurotechnologies raise concerns about personal data privacy management, integrity and responsibility, access to these systems, and potential off-label and misuse of such technologies.  

    Following the TechEthos horizon scanning and technology selection, the next step will be to perform an in-depth analysis of the ethical, policy, and legal implications and obtain a deep societal understanding of the perception of these technologies families from researchers, industry actors, policymakers, and citizens. This analysis will inform the development of ethical and legal frameworks and support the creation of operational guidelines to assist the research community in integrating ethical concerns and societal values into research protocols and technology design and development. 

    To learn more about TechEthos follow the project on Twitter and LinkedIn,  and sign up to the project newsletter. By joining the online community, you will be first in line to discover the technologies the project selects as the focus of its work and contribute to shaping the technologies of the future.

    Share:

    go to top

    Continue reading

    Book review: Thinking AI with a hammer. Kate Crawford’s Atlas of AI (2021)

    Publication
    Book review: Thinking AI with a hammer. Kate Crawford’s Atlas of AI (2021)

    Author

    Anais Resseguier, Trilateral Research Ltd

    Date of publication

    25 October 2021

    In short

    Anais Resseguier reviews Kate Crawford’s 2021 book Atlas of AI for the journal AI and Ethics, as part of TechEthos’ work on Extended Digital Reality technology family. She writes:

    Crawford’s book is a great contribution to the field, as efforts are made at various levels, national and international, in companies and educational institutions, to mitigate the harms of this technology. Crawford underlines that this can only happen if we “challenge the structures of power that AI currently reinforces and create the foundations for a different society” (p. 227).

    Cite this resource

    Resseguier, A. Thinking AI with a hammer. Kate Crawford’s Atlas of AI (2021). AI Ethics (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00115-7

    Share:

    go to top

    Continue reading

    Adopting Ethics by Design: Lessons from the SIENNA Project

    Adopting Ethics by Design: Lessons from the SIENNA Project
    25 June 2021

    Authored by: Nuala Polo
    Reviewed by: Andrew Whittington-Davis and Cristina Paca

    News | 25 June 2021

    Technological developments and breakthroughs can bring spectacular changes to society. Ongoing research has identified many technologies that will grow and revolutionise human life, for example, technologies in the field of virtual reality, autonomous systems, human enhancement and geo-engineering technologies. However, such technologies may have significant ethical and social implications, particularly for marginalised and vulnerable populations. To maximise the benefits of new and emerging technologies it is essential to prioritise ethics and societal values from the conception to the implementation and use of these systems.

    TechEthos aims to fill that role by integrating ethics and social values in the design and development of new and emerging technologies with high socioeconomic impact by developing an Ethics by Design methodology. Ethics by Design is an approach for ensuring that a technology or system is aligned with ethical values and principles. Ethical problems in new and emerging technologies, for example, Artificial Intelligence (AI), have often been detected after the system has already been deployed. The Ethics by Design approach aims to include ethical principles in the design and development processes of technological systems in order to prevent ethical issues from arising in the first place, rather than trying to fix them after the damage has been done.

    TechEthos is not starting from scratch here, work in this area has already been materialising for sometime now with the consolidation of a recent ethics framework proposed by the Eu-funded Horizon 2020 (H2020) SIENNA project. TechEthos will look to draw from the SIENNA’s framework and findings, providing a strong foundational starting base this article presents the SIENNA project in light of this, introducing the Ethics by Design methodology, and discusses the next steps for TechEthos in adopting and adapting Ethics by Design in the context of the project’s selected technology families.

    The SIENNA Project

    SIENNA, which recently ended in March 2021, worked to prioritise ethics in the design and development of three new and emerging technology areas: AI and robotics, genomics, and human enhancement. SIENNA developed a series of ethical frameworks and recommendations for policy makers, as well as ethics codes and guidelines for researchers and technology developers to ensure the ethical governance of these technologies. One key output from the SIENNA project that is particularly important for TechEthos, is SIENNA’s comprehensive methodology for Ethics by Design for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.

    This methodology includes:

    1. Identifying ethical values that should be prioritised in the context of AI and robotics, for example, fairness and transparency.
    2. Developing “ethical requisites”, which are the conditions that a system must meet to achieve its goals ethically. Ethical requisites may be met in many ways; through functionality, in data structures, in the process by which the system is constructed, and so forth. For example, in the context of AI and robotics, one way the value of fairness can be met as an ethical requisite is to require that a system does not exhibit racial bias. While many ethical requisites are aspects of the system itself, some are concerned with the way in which the system is developed. For example, the value of transparency requires that developers can explain how they tested for and removed bias from a dataset.
    3. Deriving ethical guidelines to follow at different stages of the design, development and deployment of the system. These guidelines are concrete tasks which must be performed in order to achieve the ethical requisites.

    Adopting an Ethics by Design approach in the TechEthos project

    TechEthos will carry forward the work begun in the SIENNA project, building upon its Ethics by Design methodology. In the context of the project’s selected technologies, TechEthos will apply SIENNA’s Ethics by Design approach: identifying relevant ethical values, developing ethical requisites and deriving a set of action-oriented operational ethics guidelines that support the work of the research community, research ethics committees and integrity bodies.

    TechEthos embraces the challenge of making ethics operational by ensuring that ethical and societal values can be translated into actionable guidelines to support research and innovation, and lead to behavioural change and awareness in the scientific and technological innovation communities and society more generally, by co-creating and cooperating with them.

    To learn more about TechEthos follow the project on Twitter and LinkedIn,  and sign up to the project newsletter. By joining the online community, you will be first in line to discover the technologies the project selects as the focus of its work and contribute to shaping the technologies of the future.

    Share:

    go to top

    Continue reading

    A foundation for effective ethics governance

    A foundation for effective ethics governance
    28 June 2021

    Authored by: Andrew Whittington-Davis, in dialogue with Lisa Diependaele
    Reviewed by: Nuala Polo

    News | 28 June 2021

    TechEthos caught up with Lisa Diependaele, Policy Officer at the European Commission, to understand the European Commission’s vision in the field of the ethics of new and emerging technologies and the role we can play.

    TechEthos: Could you first introduce yourself and your work for our audience?
    Lisa: I am a Policy Officer in the Unit Research Ethics & Integrity of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research and Innovation and through that my work focuses on medical ethics and ethics surrounding new and emerging technologies within a research context. Prior to joining the Commission in 2020, I was a postdoctoral researcher and assistant academic staff member at Ghent University where my research involved ethical issues relating to the protection of pharmaceuticals through patents, data exclusivity and trade secrets, and issues pertaining to the use of algorithms in the context of clinical research. As you can see, this really set me up for my role within the Commission.  I serve as Policy Officer for the TechEthos project.

    TechEthos: What is the vision of the European Commssion in the field of the ethics of new and emerging technologies?
    Lisa: Ethics and integrity in research are key components of and a prerequisite for achieving excellence in research and innovation. For new and emerging technologies with high socio-economic impact especially, the EU aims to reconcile their development and deployment with the reduction of socio-economic inequalities including, in health treatment, social status and social inclusion and gender equality.

    TechEthos: What do you feel are some of the biggest challenges for this field?
    Lisa: The challenges we face here is not complicated, but complex. Due to the diversity of unknowns and interrelated factors, no fixed sequence of steps can be determined that will bring us the solution. For me, one of the big challenges is to work out clear practical guidance. Once we have a clear picture of what the potential ethical issues and risks are, defining how they must be addressed and by whom, is more difficult. It is mainly on this point that opinions diverge. Another challenge is the increasing internationalisation and interdisciplinarity of research. This requires the development of international and cross-disciplinary terminology to talk about and address ethical issues and risks. Collaboration is key here in addressing present and future ethical risks and issues.

    TechEthos: What aspect are you most looking forward to seeing in TechEthos and why?
    Lisa: For TechEthos, I am looking forward to seeing the process and the results of the horizon scan: what are the technologies that will shape our future? But this is only the first step in what is to be an exciting journey: from the ethical analysis of the selected technologies, finding new insights, and together with experts and stakeholders work towards concrete steps to embed ethics in the research and development process of these technologies.

    TechEthos: Why are projects like TechEthos necessary?
    Lisa: We know that with technological progress we can transform society as a whole. For the uncertainties and risks, these technologies bring, however, we have to ensure that their development, from the very beginning, is tied to the realization of our values. TechEthos can be a key component of that endeavour: to create awareness, but most of all to enable researchers to embed ethics in research design and practice (ethics by design) – allowing ethics to be a research enhancer rather than red tape.

    For EU policymaking, it is pivotal that new and emerging technologies are thoroughly analysed from an ethical perspective, and that frameworks of ethical governance are developed. Projects like TechEthos, in close cooperation and co-creation with relevant stakeholders, the research community and the broader public, can provide a foundation for the effective ethics governance of these technologies and ensure these technologies unequivocally contribute to human wellbeing.

    TechEthos: What other initiatives of the Commission would you highlight in the quest to make sure new technologies are ethically designed for the future?
    Lisa: It is the key goal of the Commission to ensure that ethics and research integrity are fully integrated into research, as these are a prerequisite for research excellence and a critical factor in achieving socially relevant impact. To achieve this, Horizon Europe reinforces the development of dedicated training and education material and operational procedures for research institutions and ethics/integrity bodies. For AI, for example, operational guidelines for implementing ‘Ethics by Design and Ethics of Use Approaches for AI’ will be introduced, covering both the development and the deployment of AI-based systems. Other important initiatives are the Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027), and of course a Proposal for Regulation, laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).

    TechEthos: Anything else to add?
    Lisa: We know that integrating ethical reflection from the very beginning of the design process is pivotal in helping us to reach satisfying outcomes. However, I want to highlight that ethical reflection will not always result in answers, but it will act as a method to engage and create inclusive and continuous deliberation. Ethical reflection is about the willingness to adapt, to improve, to do better, to improve people’s lives and maximally protect their rights and interests. I think in a way we can say that adopting a critical approach, looking into the ethical challenges and risks in fact makes us optimists: it stems from a belief that we can and must achieve the best possible results.

    Image credit: Ernesto Velázquez, Unsplash

    Share:

    go to top

    Continue reading

    • 1
    • 2